Nemez
Administrator
Posts: 812
|
Post by Nemez on Nov 21, 2011 19:25:03 GMT
In bad company, it was 50% 50%
but in BF3 I prefer Rush
because I think big part of the conquest maps r designed for 64 players, that's why some of the maps feels too empty in conquest mode, big maps worked better in bad company.
In rush the focus happens in a specified area, so big maps isnt a problem. I even think rush probably works better with 24 players than with PC's 64 players
|
|
da-N-ks
Clan Member
[N4:#dake-89#]
Posts: 4,212
|
Post by da-N-ks on Nov 21, 2011 19:50:57 GMT
i still prefer conquest coz i get more points but rush wit a good squad can be more fun
|
|
|
Post by Ivan The Destroyer on Nov 21, 2011 19:56:42 GMT
suqad rush with a good squad conquest next i guess
|
|
Nemez
Administrator
Posts: 812
|
Post by Nemez on Nov 21, 2011 20:00:17 GMT
meh your'e both weird
|
|
da-N-ks
Clan Member
[N4:#dake-89#]
Posts: 4,212
|
Post by da-N-ks on Nov 22, 2011 5:49:16 GMT
we both arent... maybe r weird ever thought about it?^^
|
|
|
Post by dmsfoxie on Nov 22, 2011 10:10:06 GMT
atm I should say conquest cause I haven't done much ruch anyways but with a good team and a good microfoon connection rush could be great !
|
|